🔗 Share this article

The nation's controversial action to restrict social platforms access for young people below 16 is creating waves around the globe. Officials, safety advocates, and parents are monitoring intently to see if this tactic will become a template for other nations.

European Trend

Across Europe, a growing number of states are exploring comparable restrictions.

• The Danish government has stated a restriction on social media for under-15s, with the leader stating that smartphones and apps are "stealing our youngsters' childhood". The policy may be formalized next year.
• Norway is planning to enforce a access barrier of 15, citing the need to protect the young from the "manipulative force of the recommendation systems".
• Ireland is introducing a digital ID system to confirm the age and identity of social media participants. The media minister have indicated that an Australian-model ban could be "an measures on the table".
• In The Spanish government, the leader has urged parliament to enact a proposal increasing the legal age for using social media to 16.
• In The French government, the leader has floated the idea of a ban for children below 15, and a parliamentary commission has suggested a similar step, alongside an overnight "screen time restriction" for older teenagers.
• The authorities in The Netherlands has urged families to restrict their youngsters from social media until 15.

At the EU level, the EU parliament has adopted a symbolic motion calling for a ban for minors unless parental consent is provided. Even though it highlights of the "addictive" design of these apps, the step does not create mandatory rules.

"A strong age limit is a useful foundation," commented the MEP behind the measure.

The United Kingdom: A Cautious Approach

For the United Kingdom, the leadership has remained open to a future ban, arguing that "nothing is off the table" but maintaining any decision must be "grounded in robust data".

Last year, momentum gathered behind a legislative effort to impose restrictions on social media use by minors, but it was in the end weakened. Nonetheless, the government pledged to conduct more studies the matter.

Charities have raised apprehensions. A prominent charity set up by the family of a teenager who was lost after viewing dangerous online content suggests that a blanket age ban could fail to make platforms safer and could create a "dangerous transition" of exposure when young people turn 16.

"Australia's ban is a reaction to the failure of the tech sector to build platforms and apps that are appropriate and age appropriate for young users," stated a prominent child protection advocate.

America: A Decentralized Approach

In the United States, regulation is primarily unfolding at the regional government level due to country-wide inaction.

• Utah requires guardian permission for minors to use social media and controls late-night use.
• Florida has enacted a measure prohibiting those below 14 from joining social media, though it faces constitutional disputes.
• The state of Virginia has approved a law restricting minors to one hour of social media access per day, with extra use needing adult consent.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have likewise introduced laws demanding adult authorization for teenagers to create social media presences.

Even with widespread concern and proposals from various individuals to copy the Australian example, a federal ban is presently seen as a distant prospect.

International Perspectives

Beyond these regions, further states are likewise taking action.

• The Malaysian government plans to restrict social media for those under sixteen beginning next year.
• Brazil has raised the minimum age for the platform Instagram to 16.

Yet, world agencies adopt a more nuanced position. A major UN agency has cautioned that age-based restrictions pose dangers and "may even have unintended consequences". The agency notes that social networks can be a "vital connection" for isolated youth and that regulation should not be a "excuse" for platform operators to prioritize user protection.

While this worldwide discussion unfolds, the policies of this nation and others demonstrate that policymakers around the world are increasingly prepared to wait for tech companies to make changes on their own.